(1) Appropriate Technology For Birth. No authors listed. The Lancet - Volume 326, Issue 8452, 24. August 1985, Pages 436-437. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(85)92750-3.
(2) Maternal
death rate lower for women who underwent scheduled or elective
caesarean than for other women giving birth between 2003-2005. Birth Trauma Association Press Release, 2008. UK.
(3) Maternal
mortality and severe morbidity associated with low-risk planned
cesarean delivery versus planned vaginal delivery at term. Liu et al. CMAJ February 13, 2007; 176 (4). Canada.
(4) Maternal morbidity associated with cesarean delivery without labor compared with spontaneous onset of labor at term. Allen et al, 2003 Sep;102(3):477-82. Canada.
(5) HealthGrades Quality Study. First-Time Preplanned and "Patient Choice" Cesarean Section Rates in the United States. July, 2003. USA.
(6) Cesarean section versus forceps-assisted vaginal birth: It's time to include pelvic injury in the risk-benefit equation. Farrell S. CMAJ February 5, 2002; 166 (3). Canada.
(7) Increased neonatal mortality among normal-weight births beyond 41 weeks of gestation in California. Bruckner et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Jul 16. USA.
(8) Planned cesarean versus planned vaginal delivery at term: comparison of newborn infant outcomes. Kolas et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Dec;195(6):1538-43. Epub 2006 Jul 17. Norway.
(9) Cesarean
section on request at 39 weeks: impact on shoulder dystocia, fetal
trauma, neonatal encephalopathy, and intrauterine fetal demise. Hankins et al. Semin Perinatol. 2006 Oct; 0(5):276-87. USA.
(10) Elective caesarean delivery at maternal request: A preliminary study of motivations influencing women's decision-making.
Robson et al, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and
Gynaecology, Volume 48, Number 4, August 2008 , pp. 415-420(6).
Australia.
(11) Cesarean
section on maternal request: reasons for the request, self-estimated
health, expectations, experience of birth and signs of depression among
first-time mothers. Wiklund et al, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007;86(4):451-6. Sweden.
(12) Psychologic effects of traumatic live deliveries. Pantlen and Rohde. Zentralbl Gynakol. 2001 Jan;123(1):42-7. Germany.
(13) An investigation of women's involvement in the decision to deliver by caesarean section. Graham et al. BJOG 1999, vol. 106, no3, pp. 213-220 (34 ref.). UK.
(14) Psychological Aspects of Emergency Cesarean Section. Ryding EL. Linköping University Medical Dissertations No. 576, 1998. Sweden.
(15) Women's involvement with the decision preceding their caesarean section and their degree of satisfaction. Mould et al. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1996 Nov;103(11):1074-7. UK.
(16) More in hope than expectation: a systematic review of women's expectations and experience of pain relief in labour. Lally et alBMC Medicine 2008, 6:7. doi:10.1186/1741-7015-6-7. UK.
(17) NHS Maternity Statistics, England: 2006-2007. HESonline September 2008.
|
